Porsche Cayman 2014 vs Jaguar F-Type 2013
Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 340 HP | 380 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 460 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
Porsche Cayman engine produces 40 HP less power than Jaguar F-Type, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Jaguar F-Type. Despite less power, Porsche Cayman reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.8 | |
The Porsche Cayman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Cayman consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Type, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.28 m | 1.31 m | |
Porsche Cayman is smaller. Porsche Cayman is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Type, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Cayman is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | 196 litres | |
Porsche Cayman has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Porsche Cayman has 229 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Type. The Jaguar F-Type may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 35 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayman has
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |