Porsche Cayman 2006 vs Alfa Romeo Brera 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 273 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayman is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayman engine produces 60 HP more power than Alfa Romeo Brera, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Alfa Romeo Brera. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayman reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 12.8 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Porsche Cayman consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Brera, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Porsche Cayman consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Brera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Porsche Cayman engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 159, Alfa Romeo Spider | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo Brera might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Porsche Cayman is smaller. Porsche Cayman is 7 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Brera, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Cayman is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 610 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo Brera has more luggage space. Porsche Cayman has 40 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Brera. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayman is 0.2 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo Brera. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`620 kg | 1`890 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`300 kg | 1`470 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 320 kg | 420 kg | |
| Porsche Cayman load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Alfa Romeo Brera. Therefore, Alfa Romeo Brera is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayman has
|
Alfa Romeo Brera has
| |