Porsche Cayman 2016 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayman is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayman engine produces 120 HP more power than Volkswagen Scirocco, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volkswagen Scirocco. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayman reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Scirocco is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Porsche Cayman consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Porsche Cayman could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Porsche Cayman consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Scirocco gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Scirocco) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Porsche Cayman) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.41 m | |
| Porsche Cayman is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Scirocco, width is practically the same , while the height of Porsche Cayman is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 312 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1006 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Porsche Cayman has 162 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Scirocco. This could mean that the Porsche Cayman uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 74 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayman has
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has
| |