Porsche Cayman 2013 vs Jaguar F-Type 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Porsche Cayman
2013 - 2016
Jaguar F-Type
2013 - 2017
Body: CoupeCabrio
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Porsche Cayman is available only with rear wheel drive, while Jaguar F-Type can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.7 - 3.83.0 - 5.0

Performance

Power: 275 - 385 HP340 - 575 HP
Torque: 280 - 420 NM450 - 700 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 - 5.7 seconds3.7 - 5.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.7 - 10.38.1 - 11.3
Porsche Cayman petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar F-Type.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.92 m
Height: 1.29 m1.31 m
Porsche Cayman is smaller.
Porsche Cayman is 8 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Type, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Cayman is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres196 litres
Porsche Cayman has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Porsche Cayman has 229 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Type. The Jaguar F-Type may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Porsche Cayman is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Type.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`671~ 2`064
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data35 800
Pros and Cons: Porsche Cayman has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Jaguar F-Type has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv