Porsche Cayman 2016 vs Jaguar F-Type 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Porsche Cayman is available only with rear wheel drive, while Jaguar F-Type can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 300 - 350 HP | 340 - 550 HP | |
Torque: | 380 - 420 NM | 450 - 680 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 5.1 seconds | 4.1 - 5.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.1 | 8.4 - 11.3 | |
Porsche Cayman petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar F-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
Porsche Cayman is smaller. Porsche Cayman is 10 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Type, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Cayman is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 310 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 408 litres | |
Jaguar F-Type has more luggage space. Porsche Cayman has 160 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Type. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`675 | ~ 2`075 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 96 600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayman has
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |