Porsche Cayenne 2014 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 300 HP | 286 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 347 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
Porsche Cayenne is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 14 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.4 | |
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Cayenne consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayenne over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 93 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
Porsche Cayenne is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 782 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1554 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Porsche Cayenne has 112 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Porsche Cayenne uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Cayenne (by 226 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`812 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 30 400 | 25 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |