Porsche Cayenne 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Hybrid | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 333 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 75 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 160 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 7.5 | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Cayenne consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayenne over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2350 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is smaller. Porsche Cayenne is 14 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1690 litres | 2030 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Porsche Cayenne has 30 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Porsche Cayenne can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 51 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |