Porsche Cayenne 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 40 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 5 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 14.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Porsche Cayenne engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Porsche Cayenne is 1 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, width is practically the same , while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1770 litres | 2013 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Porsche Cayenne has 418 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`080 kg | 3`070 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`245 kg | 2`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 835 kg | 590 kg | |
| Porsche Cayenne load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Porsche Cayenne is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |