Porsche Cayenne 2002 vs BMW X5 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 20 HP more power than BMW X5, but torque is 20 NM less than BMW X5. Despite the higher power, Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 13.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.0 l/100km | 13.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Porsche Cayenne consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Porsche Cayenne could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Porsche Cayenne consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2003 4.4 engine: The main problems with the N62 engine are related to malfunctions in the Valvetronic and VANOS systems. Fluctuating idle is usually caused by ignition coil failure, air leaks, MAF sensor problems or problems ... More about BMW X5 2003 4.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is larger, but slightly lower. Porsche Cayenne is 11 cm longer than the BMW X5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1770 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
Porsche Cayenne has more luggage capacity. Porsche Cayenne has 75 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Cayenne (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Porsche Cayenne can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`080 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Porsche Cayenne has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Porsche Cayenne, so Porsche Cayenne quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
BMW X5 has
| |