Porsche Cayenne 2009 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 67 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Porsche Cayenne consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Porsche Cayenne could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Porsche Cayenne consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Porsche Cayenne engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is larger, but lower. Porsche Cayenne is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 4 cm wider, while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1770 litres | 1930 litres | |
| Porsche Cayenne has 436 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`015 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |