Porsche Cayenne 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 50 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Porsche Cayenne consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayenne over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Porsche Cayenne consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Porsche Cayenne engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Porsche Cayenne is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, width is practically the same , while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1770 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`015 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |