Porsche Cayenne 2009 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 22 HP more power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Jeep Commander. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Porsche Cayenne consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayenne over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Porsche Cayenne consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Commander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is larger, but lower. Porsche Cayenne is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Commander, 3 cm wider, while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1770 litres | 1940 litres | |
| Porsche Cayenne has 328 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`015 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |