Porsche Cayenne 2010 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 46 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 203 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite less power, Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 16.5 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Porsche Cayenne consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayenne over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Porsche Cayenne consumes 6.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Porsche Cayenne is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Porsche Cayenne has more luggage capacity. Porsche Cayenne has 213 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Cayenne (by 226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Porsche Cayenne can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`860 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |