Porsche Cayenne 2010 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Porsche Cayenne engine produces 7 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite less power, Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Porsche Cayenne consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayenne over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Porsche Cayenne consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Porsche Cayenne is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Porsche Cayenne has 112 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Porsche Cayenne uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Cayenne (by 226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`860 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |