Porsche Cayenne 2010 vs Nissan Murano 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 50 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Nissan Murano. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Porsche Cayenne consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayenne over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Porsche Cayenne consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Porsche Cayenne engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Porsche Cayenne is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Murano, 5 cm wider, while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | no data | |
|
Porsche Cayenne has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Porsche Cayenne has 268 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Murano. The Nissan Murano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Murano. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`860 | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |