Porsche Cayenne 2010 vs BMW X6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 18 HP less power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.0 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Cayenne consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Porsche Cayenne could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1410 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1540 km on highway | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X6 2012 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X6 2012 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is smaller, but slightly higher. Porsche Cayenne is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1780 litres | no data | |
|
Porsche Cayenne has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW X6, which means Porsche Cayenne can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`860 kg | 2`780 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Porsche Cayenne has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X6 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Porsche Cayenne, so Porsche Cayenne quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
BMW X6 has
| |