Porsche Cayenne 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Porsche Cayenne engine produces 13 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Porsche Cayenne consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayenne over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Porsche Cayenne consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is smaller. Porsche Cayenne is 14 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
|
Porsche Cayenne has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Porsche Cayenne has 120 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.3 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`840 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 600 | 50 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |