Porsche Cayenne 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 HP | 292 HP | |
Torque: | 550 NM | 600 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
Porsche Cayenne engine produces 47 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.5 | |
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Cayenne consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Porsche Cayenne over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 77 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
1370 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 2.07 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
Porsche Cayenne and Land Rover Range Rover Sport are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 784 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Porsche Cayenne has 114 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`840 | 3`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 30 400 | 39 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |