Peugeot Traveller 2016 vs Mercedes Vito 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Peugeot Traveller engine produces 13 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, but torque is 10 NM more than Mercedes Vito. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot Traveller) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot Traveller engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 508, Citroen SpaceTourer | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes Vito might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes Vito 2010 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Peugeot Traveller is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot Traveller is 30 cm longer than the Mercedes Vito, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot Traveller is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 798 litres | 730 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3100 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot Traveller has more luggage capacity. Peugeot Traveller has 68 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes Vito. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Traveller is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Peugeot Traveller can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`790 | 3`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Traveller has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |