Peugeot Traveller 2016 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot Traveller is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot Traveller engine produces 30 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 20 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Peugeot Traveller reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.0 | |
|
The Peugeot Traveller is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot Traveller consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Peugeot Traveller over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot Traveller gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland, Citroen C5 Aircross | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot Traveller might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Peugeot Traveller is larger. Peugeot Traveller is 46 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot Traveller is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 798 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Peugeot Traveller has more luggage capacity. Peugeot Traveller has 393 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Traveller is 1.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Peugeot Traveller can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Traveller has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |