Peugeot Traveller 2016 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Peugeot Traveller and Land Rover Freelander have the same engine power, but Peugeot Traveller torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Peugeot Traveller reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot Traveller is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot Traveller consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Peugeot Traveller over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot Traveller consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot Traveller gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 508, Citroen SpaceTourer | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot Traveller might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.74 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 798 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2550 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot Traveller has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Traveller is 1.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Peugeot Traveller can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`740 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Traveller has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |