Peugeot Traveller 2016 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Peugeot Traveller) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Land Rover Freelander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot Traveller engine produces 125 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Peugeot Traveller reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 9.6 | |
|
The Peugeot Traveller is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot Traveller consumes 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Peugeot Traveller over 15,000 km in a year you can save 660 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot Traveller gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 798 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2550 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot Traveller has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot Traveller has 393 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Traveller is 1.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Peugeot Traveller can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Traveller has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |