Peugeot Bipper 2010 vs Opel Combo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.6 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Peugeot Bipper is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot Bipper engine produces 5 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Peugeot Bipper reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.1 | |
|
The Peugeot Bipper is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot Bipper consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Peugeot Bipper over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Peugeot Bipper is 36 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 13 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot Bipper is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
884 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage space. Peugeot Bipper has 95 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 0.6 metres more than that of the Opel Combo, which means Peugeot Bipper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Bipper has
|
Opel Combo has
| |