Peugeot Bipper 2010 vs Dacia Lodgy 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Dacia Lodgy is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot Bipper engine produces 15 HP less power than Dacia Lodgy, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Dacia Lodgy. Due to the lower power, Peugeot Bipper reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
|
The Dacia Lodgy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot Bipper consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Lodgy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot Bipper could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Lodgy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Peugeot Bipper is 54 cm shorter than the Dacia Lodgy, 7 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot Bipper is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 827 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 827 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 360 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
884 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 0.7 metres more than that of the Dacia Lodgy, which means Peugeot Bipper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Bipper has
|
Dacia Lodgy has
| |