Peugeot Bipper 2010 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.6 seconds | 18 seconds | |
|
Peugeot Bipper is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot Bipper engine produces 7 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Peugeot Bipper reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Peugeot Bipper is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot Bipper and Citroen Nemo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
884 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 1.8 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Peugeot Bipper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Bipper has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |