Peugeot Bipper 2009 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
| Peugeot Bipper and Volkswagen Caddy have the same engine power, but Peugeot Bipper torque is 8 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Peugeot Bipper reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.2 | |
|
The Peugeot Bipper is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot Bipper consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Peugeot Bipper over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Caddy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia, Audi A2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Caddy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Peugeot Bipper is smaller. Peugeot Bipper is 44 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot Bipper is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
884 litres | 2239 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Peugeot Bipper has 200 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1355 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Peugeot Bipper can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Bipper has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |