Peugeot Bipper 2009 vs Nissan Cube 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Cube is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot Bipper engine produces 35 HP less power than Nissan Cube, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Nissan Cube. Due to the lower power, Peugeot Bipper reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Cube gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Cube might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Cube 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Peugeot Bipper is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Cube, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot Bipper is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
884 litres | 1563 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot Bipper has 105 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Cube. The Nissan Cube may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Cube (by 679 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Cube. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Bipper has
|
Nissan Cube has
| |