Peugeot Bipper 2009 vs Citroen C3 Picasso 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot Bipper engine produces 20 HP less power than Citroen C3 Picasso, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Citroen C3 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Peugeot Bipper reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.4 | |
| Peugeot Bipper consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot Bipper could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C3 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot Bipper might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C3 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Peugeot Bipper is smaller, but higher. Peugeot Bipper is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen C3 Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot Bipper is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
884 litres | 1506 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage space. Peugeot Bipper has 25 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3 Picasso. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 622 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means Peugeot Bipper can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`747 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Bipper has
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has
| |