Peugeot Bipper 2009 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.4 | 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 - 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 190 NM | 118 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 - 16.6 seconds | 16.2 - 18 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.6 | 4.5 - 6.6 | |
|
On average, the Peugeot Bipper petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Citroen Nemo. On average, a Peugeot Bipper with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen Nemo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Peugeot Bipper is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot Bipper and Citroen Nemo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
884 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 1.8 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Peugeot Bipper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`690 | ~ 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |