Peugeot 607 2000 vs Opel Omega 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 607 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 607 engine produces 66 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Peugeot 607 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.6 | |
| Peugeot 607 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 607 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 607) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 607 is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Peugeot 607 has 49 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 607 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Peugeot 607 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 607 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |