Peugeot 607 2003 vs Dodge Intrepid 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 317 NM | 258 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Peugeot 607 engine produces 67 HP less power than Dodge Intrepid, but torque is 59 NM more than Dodge Intrepid. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 607 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 9.1 | |
The Peugeot 607 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 607 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Intrepid, which means that by driving the Peugeot 607 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
1480 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 607 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 5.18 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
Peugeot 607 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 607 is 31 cm shorter than the Dodge Intrepid, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 607 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 520 litres | |
Dodge Intrepid has more luggage space. Peugeot 607 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Intrepid. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`070 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 607 has
|
Dodge Intrepid has
| |