Peugeot 607 2000 vs Volvo S80 1999

 
Peugeot 607
2000 - 2005
Volvo S80
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP140 HP
Torque: 317 NM290 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds11 seconds
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 607 engine produces 4 HP less power than Volvo S80, but torque is 27 NM more than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 607 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.4
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 607 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 607 could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1250 km in combined cycle
1370 km on highway1630 km on highway
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.82 m
Width: 1.84 m1.83 m
Height: 1.46 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 607 is 5 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 607 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1106 litres
Peugeot 607 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 607 has 41 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 607 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Peugeot 607 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`140
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 607 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S80 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv