Peugeot 607 2000 vs Skoda Superb 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 317 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 607 engine produces 27 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 607 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
The Peugeot 607 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 607 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Peugeot 607 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1370 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 607 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Peugeot 607 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 607 is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 8 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 607 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 607 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Peugeot 607 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 607 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |