Peugeot 607 2000 vs Jaguar S-Type 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Peugeot 607) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jaguar S-Type) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar S-Type is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 607 engine produces 104 HP less power than Jaguar S-Type, but torque is 17 NM more than Jaguar S-Type. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 607 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 10.8 | |
|
The Peugeot 607 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 607 consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type, which means that by driving the Peugeot 607 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 607 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 607) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar S-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 607 is 1 cm longer than the Jaguar S-Type, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 607 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Peugeot 607 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 607 has 111 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar S-Type. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 607 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar S-Type, which means Peugeot 607 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 607 has
|
Jaguar S-Type has
| |