Peugeot 607 2000 vs Mercedes E class 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 607 engine produces 61 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 153 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 607 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.8 | |
|
The Peugeot 607 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 607 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Peugeot 607 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 607 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 607) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Peugeot 607 is larger. Peugeot 607 is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 607 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 520 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 607 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. This could mean that the Peugeot 607 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 607 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`115 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 607 has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |