Peugeot 607 2000 vs Opel Omega 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Peugeot 607 engine produces 16 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Opel Omega. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 607 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.6 | |
| Peugeot 607 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Peugeot 607 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 607 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 607) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 607 is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Peugeot 607 has 49 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 607 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Peugeot 607 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 607 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |