Peugeot 607 2005 vs Ford Mondeo 2007

 
Peugeot 607
2005 - 2009
Ford Mondeo
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.9 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 211 HP220 HP
Torque: 290 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds7.5 seconds
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 607 engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 607 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.29.3
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 607 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 607 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway1020 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 500'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 607 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years3 years
Engine spread: Used also on Peugeot 407Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 607 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.84 m
Width: 1.84 m1.89 m
Height: 1.46 m1.50 m
Peugeot 607 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 607 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data554 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`185
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 18002600
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 607 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv