Peugeot 607 2005 vs Volvo S80 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 607
2005 - 2009
Volvo S80
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Peugeot 607 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.92.0 - 4.4

Performance

Power: 110 - 211 HP136 - 315 HP
Torque: 217 - 440 NM185 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 - 14.1 seconds6.5 - 10.9 seconds
In general, Volvo S80 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Peugeot 607. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 10.25.7 - 12.0
Peugeot 607 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S80. On average, Peugeot 607 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.88 m4.85 m
Width: 1.84 m1.86 m
Height: 1.46 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 607 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 607 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres480 litres
Peugeot 607 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 607 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 607 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Peugeot 607 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 2`101 kg~ 2`209 kg
Net weight:~ 1`602 kg~ 1`607 kg
Load capacity:~ 499 kg~ 602 kg
Peugeot 607 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Volvo S80. Therefore, Volvo S80 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 18003600
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 607 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S80 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv