Peugeot 508 2018 vs Jaguar XF 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Peugeot 508) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Jaguar XF) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 508 engine produces 70 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.6 l/100km + 15.2 kWh/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 7.40 € | 13.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 508) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Peugeot 508 is smaller. Peugeot 508 is 18 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1780 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Peugeot 508 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Peugeot 508 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`290 kg | 2`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`745 kg | 1`700 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 590 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |