Peugeot 508 2014 vs Jaguar XF 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 508 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 508 engine produces 41 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.1 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 508 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 508 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 508) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Citroen C5 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Peugeot 508 is smaller. Peugeot 508 is 15 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 512 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1592 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Peugeot 508 has 38 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Peugeot 508 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |