Peugeot 508 2010 vs Volvo V70 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 508 engine produces 11 HP less power than Volvo V70, but torque is 10 NM more than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 508 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 508 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Peugeot 508 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 508 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
| Peugeot 508 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 6 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
560 litres | no data | |
| Peugeot 508 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Peugeot 508 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |