Peugeot 508 2014 vs Volvo V60 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 508 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 508 engine produces 15 HP more power than Volvo V60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 508 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 508 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 508 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 146 mm (5.7 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 508 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 508 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Peugeot 508 is 20 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1183 litres | 1241 litres | |
| Peugeot 508 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V60 (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`995 kg | 2`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`400 kg | 1`644 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 595 kg | 456 kg | |
| Peugeot 508 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Volvo V60. Therefore, Peugeot 508 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
| |