Peugeot 508 2014 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 508 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 508 and Mazda 6 have the same engine power, but Peugeot 508 torque is 27 NM more than Mazda 6. Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.2 | |
|
The Peugeot 508 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 508 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Peugeot 508 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 508 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 146 mm (5.7 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Peugeot 208 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 508 is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1183 litres | no data | |
| Peugeot 508 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`046 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |