Peugeot 508 2018 vs Jaguar XF 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 508 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 508 engine produces 14 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.3 | |
| Peugeot 508 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Peugeot 508 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 508) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 508 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland, Citroen C5 Aircross | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 508 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Peugeot 508 is smaller. Peugeot 508 is 18 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1780 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Peugeot 508 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Peugeot 508 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`146 kg | 2`260 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`678 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 606 kg | 582 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |