Peugeot 508 2018 vs Jaguar XF 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 508 engine produces 25 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 508 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 508 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Peugeot 508 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 508 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 508) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Peugeot 308 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Peugeot 508 is smaller. Peugeot 508 is 18 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1780 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Peugeot 508 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Peugeot 508 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`028 kg | 2`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`700 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 598 kg | 590 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |