Peugeot 508 2010 vs Volvo V70 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Peugeot 508 and Volvo V70 have the same engine power, but Peugeot 508 torque is 60 NM less than Volvo V70. Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.9 | |
Peugeot 508 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 508 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1440 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
1800 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
Peugeot 508 is smaller. Peugeot 508 and Volvo V70 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 575 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
560 litres | 1580 litres | |
Peugeot 508 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 1020 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Peugeot 508 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`310 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 7000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |