Peugeot 508 2014 vs Volvo C30 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 204 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 450 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.3 seconds | 6.7 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 5.7 | 4.5 - 9.0 | |
|
Peugeot 508 petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30. On average, Peugeot 508 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Peugeot 508 is larger. Peugeot 508 is 55 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 7 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1592 litres | 921 litres | |
|
Peugeot 508 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 508 has 309 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 508 (by 671 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means Peugeot 508 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`153 | ~ 1`848 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |