Peugeot 508 2014 vs Volvo C30 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 508
2014 - 2018
Volvo C30
2009 - 2013
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.21.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 115 - 204 HP100 - 230 HP
Torque: 240 - 450 NM150 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 12.3 seconds6.7 - 11.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.0 - 5.74.5 - 9.0
Peugeot 508 petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30. On average, Peugeot 508 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.81 m4.27 m
Width: 1.85 m1.78 m
Height: 1.48 m1.44 m
Peugeot 508 is larger.
Peugeot 508 is 55 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 7 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 560 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1592 litres921 litres
Peugeot 508 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 508 has 309 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 508 (by 671 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.2 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means Peugeot 508 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`153~ 1`848
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 96004800
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 508 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Volvo C30 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv