Peugeot 508 2010 vs Skoda Superb 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 - 204 HP | 125 - 260 HP | |
Torque: | 156 - 450 NM | 200 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.9 seconds | 6.6 - 10.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.3 | 5.9 - 10.2 | |
Peugeot 508 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. On average, Peugeot 508 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
Peugeot 508 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 633 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
560 litres | no data | |
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Peugeot 508 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Peugeot 508 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`119 | ~ 2`143 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 5400 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |