Peugeot 5008 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 5008 engine produces 65 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 5008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.4 | |
|
The Peugeot 5008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 5008 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 5008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 236 mm (9.3 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 508, Citroen SpaceTourer | Used also on Volvo XC70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 5008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Peugeot 5008 is smaller. Peugeot 5008 and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 780 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | 1455 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 5008 (by 485 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 5008 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Peugeot 5008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 5008 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |