Peugeot 5008 2017 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 146 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 196 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 5008 engine produces 26 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 104 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 5008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 7.3 | |
The Peugeot 5008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 5008 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Peugeot 5008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
1320 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 5008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Peugeot 3008, Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Peugeot 5008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
Peugeot 5008 is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 5008 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 780 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 5008 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Peugeot 5008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`985 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 20 200 | 18 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 5008 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |